Dance in the Full Moon

O, the Frailty of Memory

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

3.27

Of course I noticed she was black. People who claim they don't notice are lying to you. Anyway, she's black enough to have the color bleed into the whites of her eyes and the palms of her hands and the soles of her feet--the last places color goes before it peters out entirely and has nowhere else at all. Her teeth are almost violently white against her skin and lips. She looks like brushed velvet, reflecting the light of some distant lamp your aunt gave you when you moved into your new apartment, and when she takes off the velvet coat (who owns those anymore) and drapes it across the couch, all you can think is how it matches what you feel about her skin just at that moment. That's how black she is, and if you didn't notice, you're blind.
I noticed, all right. But I didn't think about what it meant until after I had kissed her out on the street under the night lights, me so white I seemed to glow, her so black she seemed to sink. I thought about it then--the picture we must make in the neon from the bar and the saccharine yellow from the corner lamp post--and I said to myself "by God, if my father could see me now--" and that ruined it for me; the knowledge of other racisms and other hates ruined it for me, and I began picturing how my own racisms would grow and my own hates would develop until I could no longer kiss the black girl underneath the lamp post in the dark of a night into which neither of us wanted to stray. So I held her tight for what time I had and whispered her name to myself until it was all I could hear: "Ivory."

24 comments:

  1. Why was her name Ivory?

    I wish the whole people noticing/not noticing thing weren't an issue. I don't know if this makes sense, but I don't actually notice. Not at first. I see, obviously, but I don't pay attention until something in their thoughts arrests me, and then I notice. So, like, it's not that I don't know that Daphne has milk chocolate skin and an afro that I would have done a lot for when I was ten. And sure, I know that Caitlin has brown eyes and looks a bit like that girl from Scooby Doo. But neither of those things meant anything to me until we became friends.

    I hate the inevitability of this-- of him pretty much expecting to become his father. I hate that he lets it ruin things.

    "Saccharine" is a good word. Also, this provokes deep thoughts and also reminds me of a piano and also China.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Her name is ivory because it's how he wishes she was, or at least that he was ebony. Or it's the beginning of his own racism shining through, or my racism, or her mother's racism, or my way of making you think about your own racism.
    I think that he knows how racism develops in the company of a racist, and pretty much nowhere else, and the fact that he knows it and doesn't want it will either mean he succumbs to it as he expects or he will overcome it because he's prepared to fight.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One rarified Sabbath morning, I saw Kyle Cox, then Ashlee Dollar, then Hubert Maitland. I realized, then, that they were all black and I hoped against hope that the person behind me whom I didn't know wouldn't suddenly judge me that I was a whigger or anything like that. Then I realized how stupid it sounded and moved on with my life. I'm usually pretty good until something else forces me to notice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So he either doesn't know her real name or refuses to use it. Hmm.

    Is everyone racist?

    At least he doesn't want it, I guess.

    Hey so it turns out that Kyle, Ashlee, and Hubert are three of my favorite people!

    You do seem to have a talent for things.

    It's funny how much racism is tied into what other people think (of you/what you think).

    ReplyDelete
  5. What? NO STOP READING THINGS OUTSIDE THE TEXT, JANELLE. Ivory is her name it says so right there where in PANTS did you get that idea?

    ReplyDelete
  6. ROBBY YOU SAID "HER NAME IS IVORY BECAUSE IT'S HOW HE WISHES SHE WAS."

    Forgive me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. YOU ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION AND THEN READ TOO LITTLE OF THE ANSWER.
    There are a million reasons why her name could be ivory. None of them are right.

    ReplyDelete
  8. SO MUCH DRAMA.

    I could throw a monkey wrench into the mix (although who really knows what a monkey wrench is, or what it does, unless you've grown up in your father's garage with the red tool chest looming over you, hiding shiny rows of mysterious objects? I wouldn't have the faintest, if not for that) and say...well, no. I wouldn't say that. I'll stick with something random, like black lace being better than white.

    My mother's side are racist in the worst way; not an outright hatred or anything raving or delusional, nothing so outrageous (unless you go back to my grandfather, and his father before him who was a member of the KKK until he died)...it's more insidious. Where they would never claim superiority unless one of us tried to date, or even worse, fall in love with a dark boy. I never tried it, but once when I came home full of stories about a boy with mixed blood, my aunt berated me for an hour, with nobody disagreeing with her, until my dad shut her up. I know that if I did bring home a black boy, bibles would be pulled and voices raised and really, I'm not sure what the end result would be.

    I do know that my housemate is black, and I've never noticed. Not because she "acts white"; but because she's Steph. Just Steph.

    Your guy. I hope he grows a backbone, if she's worth it to him. If not, he shouldn't even try, because she deserves better than a halfhearted effort, just like Steph deserved better than the boy who worked his way into her heart earlier this year, and then backed off because of his idiot conservative Michigan family.

    I wrote a lot. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree with you, Lyssa, and I'm sorry about your family.

    My family has never had to deal with issues of race, so I honestly don't know where my relatives stand on it. I think they're self-aware enough to not want to be that way.

    No, actually, I think my family's experiences in Africa have skewed things a bit. A lot.

    Anyway, you're right, Lyssa.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm sorry for your sad story. It gives me grrface.

    No! But see, the kid I see in my head is standing at a crossroads of family and love, and family he knows he has but love he thinks might leave because it will only last as long as he stays in the lamplight. And! He assumes that he can't have both and he assumes that to be in his family he has to be intolerant! See? It doesn't change anything. He's an asshole for not backing her up in front of his dad and for thinking of her as a color when there's undoubtedly much more to her and for treating her like a future instead of a present, very real, breathing girl who wants to kiss him.

    But undoubtedly she has issues too, so who am I to judge?

    I see color. But I don't really know if anybody REALLY doesn't. I think what we as a society mean is that we don't think ABOUT color? But I have yet to meet a truly wicked person, so who knows.

    ReplyDelete
  11. My great great uncle was a member of the KKK. But in Oklahoma where there were no black people to hate and where the natives had already been corralled. The chapter acted more like local vigilantes, I guess. Because the sheriff was nearly an hour away by car?

    Still, the thought of racism in my family scares me.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh my. This reminds me of lots of things. First, a very wise person told me recently that a good friend of mine struggles with relationships because that person's family will never think anyone is good enough.

    Second, my gay cousin Benny just got engaged, and the whole thing has been terribly difficult for Ben and for our family in much the same way I think people used to/do treat multiracial/cultural marriages?

    (My sister got forced to choose between family and love. She chose love, but then the family was given back to her.)

    Yeah, and we don't get to see her issues. Does he see them? Yeah, yeah, I know. That wasn't the point. But still. He doesn't seem comfortable telling her his issues, so . . .

    You know ("No, I don't."), I think not seeing color would be a loss. I realize that Diller says that acknowledging differences means creating rank/superiority. But the whole point of "difference" is that it isn't a comparison or contrast that creates a hierarchy. Movies got better when they stopped being shades of gray. The worlds they created got richer, fuller. And yes, I know that is a poor analogy, but still. How many people would choose to stay in Kansas when they could go to Oz?

    (Turns out this has tapped into an issue about which I am almost continually angry.)

    I remember you saying so. This probably won't be helpful, but every family has, I think, such skeletons. A few years ago, my mom mentioned that we're related to a family with the last name "Gay," and that one of them is in prison because he killed somewhere between 27 and 31 people.

    You know ("No, I don't."), I used to think that I didn't fit my family at all and was therefore not bound by my family's genes. For a time, I thought it was a terrible thing, and then I thought maybe it was okay. I have since discovered that I do, in fact, share general characteristics with my family members. For a time, I thought it was a terrible thing, and then I thought maybe it was okay. Now I know that I have a choice. I can give in to tradition or to genes or to my own broken coping mechanisms, or I can try new things.

    I know you know this, but I thought maybe repeating it would be useful for something or other. At least for my own benefit.

    [Sorry for all the long comments.]

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hm. Don't know where to comment or what to say.
    Basically, I don't like hate or fear, but I feel like sometimes I'm almost a part of the badness.

    I try to avoid that.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think that's about the best you can do. I kind of stayed up late rambling.

    I know you don't, and I think making that effort and being self aware is about the most anyone can really do.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ok. But where does being self-aware cause action?

    ReplyDelete
  16. You missed my question: At what point does being self-aware lead to action/change?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I didn't miss the question; I avoided it.

    Self-awareness does not irrevocably cause action or change, but it creates the opportunity for it. If one does not recognize that a problem exists, then one cannot choose to correct it.

    This is, incidentally, exactly what I was trying to say about faith but in reverse. We are self-aware enough to recognize that we need to have faith (Occam's razor and all that). That knowledge will get us nothing unless we act upon it.

    How many people know that they need more faith or to not be racist or better health habits? How many people do something as the result of the knowledge of that need?

    So here, with the whole racism thing, being self-aware is a necessary logical step. Making an effort to correct it is the next logical step.

    I think people often let themselves off at the acknowledgement of the need because it's better than ignorance and easier than action.

    I seem to be contradicting myself.

    I will say one other thing, though, and that is this: positive feelings are, in my mind, the soul's acknowledgement that a need has been/is being met, and negative feelings are the soul's acknowledgement that a need has been created/unmet. So one may seek a feeling, but the feeling will not exist until the need behind it is dealt with.

    Goodness, this rambled and made no sense, and this is exactly why I attempted to avoid the question. You're welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  18. And where you neatly avoided the question before, you messily avoided it this time.

    I think that self-awareness can, at some point, scream a need for change. As a person becomes aware, they cannot help but change, whether to reform or retrench. But it happens.
    I just don't know where the tipping point sits.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ah. And all this time, I was working from the premise that self-awareness is not required to cause change.

    Does the tipping point have to be the same for every person? I don't think it does.

    Ha! So there. Your question is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Haha fine.
    Anyway, it would look pretty much the same for everyone, but not be at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'm not sure whether I agree with that. I think it's clearly recognizable when it happens, but different people have different issues.

    ReplyDelete